Adding Value to the Mathematics and Science Partnership Evaluations

 

PROJECT MISSION


CONFERENCES


STAFF


RELATED BIBLIOGRAPHY


RESOURCES/LINKS


LINK TO MSPnet ONLINE DISCUSSION

Related Bibliography

Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1989). Quantitative models for estimating teacher and school effectiveness. In R. Darrell Bock, Multilevel analysis of educational data. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc., pp. 205-232.  (SUMMARY)

Clotfelter, C.T., & Ladd, H.F. (1996). Recognizing and rewarding success in public schools. In Helen F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 23-63.  (SUMMARY)

Hanushek, E A. & Taylor, L. (1990). Alternative assessments of the performance of schools. Journal of Human Resources, 25(2), 179–201.  (SUMMARY)

Kahle, J. B. (1999). Discovering from Discovery: The evaluation of Ohio’s systemic initiative. In N. L. Webb (Ed.), Evaluation of systemic reform in mathematics and science. Synthesis and proceedings of the Fourth Annual NISE Forum (Workshop Report No. 8). Madison: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.  (SUMMARY)

Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., Stecher, B. M., Robin, A., & Burroughs, D. (2000). Teaching practices and student achievement: Report of first-year findings from the “Mosaic” study of systemic initiatives in mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.   (SUMMARY)

Mandeville, G.K. (1994). The South Carolina experience with incentives. In Thomas A. Downes and William A. Testa (Eds.), Midwest approaches to school reform. Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, October 26-27, pp. 69-97.
 (SUMMARY)

Meyer, R.H. (1996). Value-added indicators of school performance. In Eric A. Hanushek, and Dale W. Jorgenson, (Eds.), Improving America’s schools: The role of incentives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp.197-223.   (SUMMARY)

Meyer, R.H. (1999). The effects of math and math-related courses in high school. In Susan E. Mayer, and Paul E. Peterson, (Eds.), Earning and learning: How schools matter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 169-204.   (SUMMARY)

Meyer, R.H. (2000). Value-added indicators: A powerful tool for evaluating science and mathematics programs and policies. Issue Brief, 3(3). Madison: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.  (SUMMARY)

Meyer, R.H. (2001). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the Urban Systemic Initiative and other academic reforms in Texas: Statistical models for analyzing large-scale datasets. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.   (SUMMARY)

Millman, J. (1997). Grading teachers, grading schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
 (SUMMARY)

Mitchell, J., Levine, R., & Bitter, C. (2004). University and K-12 school partnerships: How does one make these happen? American Institutes for Research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April 16, 2004. 

Raudenbush, S.W., & Willms, D.J. (1991).  Schools, classrooms, and pupils. San Diego: Academic Press. 

Raudenbush, S.W., & Willms, D.J. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(4) (winter), 307-336. (SUMMARY)

Sanders, W.L., & Horn, S.P. (1994). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299-311.

Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (NISE Research Monograph No. 6). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.  (SUMMARY)

Webb, N. L. (2002). An analysis of the alignment between mathematics standards and assessments for three states. A paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.   (SUMMARY)

Webb, N. L., Century, J. R., Davila, N., Heck, D. J., & Osthoff, E. (in press). Challenges to evaluating systemic reform in mathematics and science. Madison: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.  (SUMMARY)

Webb, N. L., Clune, W. H., Bolt, D., Gamoran, A., Meyer, R. H., Osthoff, E., & Thorn, C. (2002). Models for analysis of the impact of systemic initiative programs—The impact of urban systemic initiatives on student achievement in Texas, 1994 to 2000. Technical Report to the National Science Foundation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.  (SUMMARY)

Webb, N. L., Cohen, A., &  Kang, Taehoon. (2002). A comparison of SSI and non-SSI performance on state NAEP mathematics assessment items. A paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.  (SUMMARY)

Webb, N. L., Kane, J., Kaufman, D., & Yang, J. (2001). Study of the impact of Statewide Systemic Initiatives Program: Technical report to the National Science Foundation on the use of State NAEP data to assess the impact of the Statewide Systemic Initiatives. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.  (SUMMARY)

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH REFERENCES 

Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the trade. How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 

Clandinin, D. J. and F. M. Connelly (2000). Narrative inquiry.  Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

Denzin, N. and Y. Lincoln, Eds. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage.  

Emerson, R. M., R. I. Fretz, et al. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.  

Graue, M. E. and D. J. Walsh (1998). Studying children in context:  Theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.  

Jackson, B. (1986). Fieldwork. Urbana, IL, Illini Books.  

Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman (1984). Qualitative data analysis.  A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, Sage.  

Schensul, J. J. and M. D. LeCompte, Eds. (1999). The Ethnographer's toolkit. Walnut Creek, CA, Alta Mira Press. 

Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York, Teachers College Press. 

Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston.  

Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, Holt Rinehart & Winston. 

Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research.  Grounded theory procedures & techniques. Walnut Creek, Sage.

Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. Descriptions, analysis & interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.

CASE STUDY REFERENCES

Resources for Case Study Design and Evaluation
Donna M. Mertens, Ph.D. (
Donna.Mertens@Gallaudet.edu)
Gallaudet University
February 17, 2005
Wisconsin RETA's Adding Value Conference
Madison, WI

Mertens, Donna M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. This text can be ordered online from SAGE. (www.sagepub.com)

Mertens, D. M., & McLaughlin, J. (2004). Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. 

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

Eisenhart, Margaret. (2001). Educational ethnography past, present, and future: Ideas to think with.  Educational Researcher, 30 (8), 16-17. 

Evans, J. F. (1998).  Changing the lens: A position paper on the value of qualitative research methodology as a mode of educational inquiry in the education of the deaf.  American Annals of the Deaf, 143(3), 246-254. 

Meloy, Judith M.  (2002). Writing the qualitative dissertation. (2nd ed.)  Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 

Barnes, Colin (2001). ‘Emancipatory' Disability Research: project or process?  Public lecture, University of Leeds, England, October 24.  Retrieved August 26, 2003 [On-line at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Barnes/glasgow%20lecture.pdf

Mertens, Donna M. (1999).  Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation.  American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 1-14. 

Spencer, P. E., Erting, C. J., & Marschark, M. (Eds.) (2000).  The deaf child in the family and at school.  Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

Truman, C., Mertens, D. M., & Humphries, B. (2000).  Research and inequality.  London:  Taylor & Francis. 

Mertens, D.M. (1996) Breaking the silence about sexual abuse of deaf youth.  American Annals of the Deaf, 141(5), 352-358. 

Evans, Judith F. (1995).  Conversations at home:  A case study of a young deaf child's communication experiences in a family in which all others can hear.  American Annals of the Deaf, 140(4), 324-332. 

Hopson, R. K. (Ed.), (2000).  How and why language matters.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 86. 

Pollock, Mica. (2001). How the question we ask most about race in education is the very question we most suppress.  Educational Researcher, 39(9), 2-12. 

Reinharz, Shulamit. (1992). Feminist methods in social research.  Oxford:  Oxford University Press. 

Stanfield, John H., II & Dennis, Rutledge M.  (Eds.) (1993). Race and ethnicity in research methods.  Newbury Park, CA:  Sage. 

Collins, Patricia Hill.  (2000).  Black feminist thought.  NY:  Routledge. 

Marin, Gerardo & Marin, Barbara V. (1991).  Research with Hispanic populations.  Newbury Park, CA:  Sage. 

W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (1998).  W. K. Kellogg Foundation Evaluation Handbook.  Battle Creek, MI: Author. http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub770.pdf to download; or order from: http://www.wkkf.org/Programming/Overview.aspx?CID=281 (If you have trouble with this link, try using www.wkkf.org and then clicking on their Evaluation Toolkit link.) 

W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2001). W. K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide. Battle Creek, MI: Author. Download at: http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf  or order from: http://www.wkkf.org/Programming/Overview.aspx?CID=281 (If you have trouble with this link, try using www.wkkf.org and then clicking on their Evaluation Toolkit link.) 

Russ-Eft, Darlene & Preskill, Hallie. (2001). Evaluation in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.  

Stake, R. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

Torres, Rosalie T., Preskill, Hallie S., & Piontek, Mary E. (1996).  Evaluation strategies for communication and reporting: Enhancing learning in organizations.  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

Yin, R. (2003a). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

Yin, R. (2003b). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

 
HOME PROJECT MISSION CONFERENCES STAFF RELATED BIBLIOGRAPHY RESOURCES/ LINKS ONLINE
DISCUSSION