|
Bryk,
A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1989). Quantitative models
for estimating teacher and school effectiveness. In R.
Darrell Bock, Multilevel
analysis of educational data. San Diego: Academic
Press, Inc., pp. 205-232.
(SUMMARY)
Clotfelter,
C.T., & Ladd, H.F. (1996). Recognizing and rewarding
success in public schools. In Helen F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding
schools accountable. Washington, DC: The Brookings
Institution, pp. 23-63.
(SUMMARY)
Hanushek,
E A. & Taylor, L. (1990). Alternative assessments of
the performance of schools. Journal
of Human Resources, 25(2), 179–201.
(SUMMARY)
Kahle,
J. B. (1999). Discovering from Discovery: The evaluation
of Ohio’s systemic initiative. In N. L. Webb (Ed.),
Evaluation of systemic reform in mathematics and science.
Synthesis and proceedings of the Fourth Annual NISE Forum
(Workshop Report No. 8). Madison: University of Wisconsin,
National Institute for Science Education. (SUMMARY)
Klein,
S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., Stecher, B. M.,
Robin, A., & Burroughs, D. (2000). Teaching practices
and student achievement: Report of first-year findings
from the “Mosaic” study of systemic initiatives in
mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
(SUMMARY)
Mandeville,
G.K. (1994). The South Carolina experience with
incentives. In Thomas A. Downes and William A. Testa
(Eds.), Midwest
approaches to school reform. Proceedings of a
Conference Held at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago,
October 26-27, pp. 69-97.
(SUMMARY)
Meyer,
R.H. (1996). Value-added indicators of school performance.
In Eric A. Hanushek, and Dale W. Jorgenson, (Eds.), Improving
America’s schools: The role of incentives.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp.197-223.
(SUMMARY)
Meyer,
R.H. (1999). The effects of math and math-related courses
in high school. In Susan E. Mayer, and Paul E. Peterson,
(Eds.), Earning and
learning: How schools matter. Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution Press, pp. 169-204.
(SUMMARY)
Meyer,
R.H. (2000). Value-added indicators: A powerful tool for
evaluating science and mathematics programs and policies.
Issue Brief, 3(3). Madison: University of
Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education.
(SUMMARY)
Meyer,
R.H. (2001). An evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Urban Systemic Initiative and other academic reforms in
Texas: Statistical models for analyzing large-scale
datasets. Report prepared for the National Science
Foundation. Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education
Research.
(SUMMARY)
Millman,
J. (1997). Grading
teachers, grading schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Press, Inc.
(SUMMARY)
Mitchell, J., Levine, R., & Bitter, C.
(2004). University and K-12 school partnerships: How
does one make these happen? American Institutes for
Research. Paper presented at the American Educational
Research Association, San Diego, CA, April 16, 2004.
Raudenbush,
S.W., & Willms, D.J. (1991).
Schools,
classrooms, and pupils. San Diego: Academic Press.
Raudenbush,
S.W., & Willms, D.J. (1995).
The estimation of school
effects. Journal of
Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(4)
(winter), 307-336.
(SUMMARY)
Sanders,
W.L., & Horn, S.P. (1994).
The Tennessee Value-Added
Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed model methodology in
educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8,
299-311.
Webb, N. L. (1997).
Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics
and science education (NISE Research Monograph No. 6).
Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National
Institute for Science Education. Washington, DC: Council
of Chief State School Officers.
(SUMMARY)
Webb, N. L. (2002). An analysis of the
alignment between mathematics standards and assessments
for three states. A paper presented at the American
Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New
Orleans, LA.
(SUMMARY)
Webb, N. L., Century, J. R.,
Davila, N., Heck, D. J., & Osthoff, E. (in press).
Challenges to evaluating systemic reform in mathematics
and science. Madison: University of Wisconsin,
National Institute for Science Education.
(SUMMARY)
Webb,
N. L., Clune, W. H., Bolt, D., Gamoran, A., Meyer, R. H.,
Osthoff, E., & Thorn, C. (2002). Models
for analysis of the impact of systemic initiative
programs—The impact of urban systemic initiatives on
student achievement in Texas, 1994 to 2000. Technical Report to the National Science Foundation. Madison, WI:
University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education
Research.
(SUMMARY)
Webb, N. L., Cohen, A., &
Kang, Taehoon. (2002). A comparison of SSI and non-SSI
performance on state NAEP mathematics assessment items. A
paper presented at the American Educational Research
Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
(SUMMARY)
Webb, N. L., Kane, J., Kaufman, D.,
& Yang, J. (2001). Study of the impact of Statewide
Systemic Initiatives Program: Technical report to the
National Science Foundation on the use of State NAEP data
to assess the impact of the Statewide Systemic
Initiatives. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin
Center for Education Research.
(SUMMARY)
QUALITATIVE
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the trade. How to think about
your research while you’re doing it. Chicago, University
of Chicago Press.
Clandinin,
D. J. and F. M. Connelly (2000). Narrative inquiry.
Experience and story in qualitative research. San
Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
Denzin,
N. and Y. Lincoln, Eds. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative
Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
Emerson,
R. M., R. I. Fretz, et al. (1995). Writing ethnographic
fieldnotes. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Graue, M.
E. and D. J. Walsh (1998). Studying children in
context: Theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand
Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
Jackson,
B. (1986). Fieldwork. Urbana, IL, Illini Books.
Miles, M.
B. and A. M. Huberman (1984). Qualitative data
analysis. A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills,
Sage.
Schensul,
J. J. and M. D. LeCompte, Eds. (1999). The
Ethnographer's toolkit. Walnut Creek, CA, Alta Mira
Press.
Seidman,
I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research.
New York, Teachers College Press.
Spradley,
J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York,
Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Spradley,
J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York,
Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Strauss,
A. and J. Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative
Research. Grounded theory procedures & techniques.
Walnut Creek, Sage.
Wolcott,
H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data.
Descriptions, analysis & interpretation. Thousand
Oaks, CA, Sage.
CASE STUDY
REFERENCESResources for Case Study Design and Evaluation
Donna M. Mertens, Ph.D. (Donna.Mertens@Gallaudet.edu)
Gallaudet University
February 17, 2005
Wisconsin RETA's Adding Value Conference
Madison, WI
Mertens, Donna M. (2005). Research and evaluation in
education and psychology: Integrating diversity with
quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage. This text can be ordered online from
SAGE. (www.sagepub.com)
Mertens, D. M., & McLaughlin, J. (2004).
Research and Evaluation Methods in Special Education. (2nd
ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and
case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey
Bass.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research &
evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Eisenhart, Margaret. (2001). Educational
ethnography past, present, and future: Ideas to think with.
Educational Researcher, 30 (8), 16-17.
Evans, J. F. (1998). Changing the lens: A
position paper on the value of qualitative research
methodology as a mode of educational inquiry in the
education of the deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 143(3),
246-254.
Meloy, Judith M. (2002). Writing the
qualitative dissertation. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Barnes, Colin (2001). ‘Emancipatory'
Disability Research: project or process? Public lecture,
University of Leeds, England, October 24. Retrieved August
26, 2003 [On-line at:
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Barnes/glasgow%20lecture.pdf]
Mertens, Donna M. (1999). Inclusive
evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for
evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), 1-14.
Spencer, P. E., Erting, C. J., & Marschark,
M. (Eds.) (2000). The deaf child in the family and at
school. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Truman, C., Mertens, D. M., & Humphries, B.
(2000). Research and inequality. London: Taylor &
Francis.
Mertens, D.M. (1996) Breaking the silence
about sexual abuse of deaf youth. American Annals of the
Deaf, 141(5), 352-358.
Evans, Judith F. (1995). Conversations at
home: A case study of a young deaf child's communication
experiences in a family in which all others can hear.
American Annals of the Deaf, 140(4), 324-332.
Hopson, R. K. (Ed.), (2000). How and why
language matters. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass
Publishers. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 86.
Pollock, Mica. (2001). How the question we
ask most about race in education is the very question we
most suppress. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 2-12.
Reinharz, Shulamit. (1992). Feminist
methods in social research. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Stanfield, John H., II & Dennis, Rutledge M.
(Eds.) (1993). Race and ethnicity in research methods.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Collins, Patricia Hill. (2000). Black
feminist thought. NY: Routledge.
Marin, Gerardo & Marin, Barbara V. (1991).
Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park,
CA: Sage.
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (1998). W. K.
Kellogg Foundation Evaluation Handbook. Battle Creek, MI:
Author.
http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub770.pdf to
download; or order from:
http://www.wkkf.org/Programming/Overview.aspx?CID=281
(If you have trouble with this link, try using
www.wkkf.org and then clicking on their Evaluation
Toolkit link.)
W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2001). W. K.
Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide. Battle
Creek, MI: Author. Download at:
http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf
or order from:
http://www.wkkf.org/Programming/Overview.aspx?CID=281
(If you have trouble with this link, try using
www.wkkf.org and then clicking on their Evaluation
Toolkit link.)
Russ-Eft, Darlene & Preskill, Hallie. (2001).
Evaluation in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Perseus
Publishing.
Stake, R. (2004). Standards-based and
responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Torres, Rosalie T., Preskill, Hallie S., &
Piontek, Mary E. (1996). Evaluation strategies for
communication and reporting: Enhancing learning in
organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. (2003a). Applications of case study
research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. (2003b). Case study research: Design
and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
